Search for: All records

Phenolic aldehydes are widespread pollutants in water and soil, originating from lignin-based agro-industries. With increasing wastewater pollution, improved treatment systems are necessary to degrade phenolic aldehydes into less hazardous compounds. Over the past two decades, ozonolysis wastewater treatment has been implemented in the United States, Japan, and South Korea. However, the mechanistic understanding of phenolic aldehyde ozonolysis in water remains incomplete. This study investigates the ozonolysis of three model phenolic aldehydes (syringaldehyde, vanillin, 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde) in representative concentrations for wastewater of 0.5–1.5 mM and pH 4–8. Each compound solution was sparged for 30 min at a fixed O3(g) flow (0.20 to 1.00 L min−1), providing steady-state dissolved concentrations of 5.4 to 16.2 μM. Reactant loss and product generation were monitored using UV–visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy, ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography (UHPLC) with UV–vis and mass spectrometry (MS) detection, and ion chromatography with conductivity and MS detection of anions. Identified products based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/z−) included oxalic acid (89), glycolic acid (75), formic acid (45), and maleic acid (115). Additional intermediate products were identified under various reaction conditions, revealing competing mechanisms in the degradative oxidation of aqueous phenolic aldehydes exposed to O3(g). A unifying mechanism is proposed to explain the production of smaller, less toxic molecules during phenolic aldehyde ozonolysis, enhancing water quality. This mechanism serves as a basis for evaluating the implementation of ozonolysis in scaled-up water treatment processes. 

the central United States, PW disposal occurs through deep well injection, which can increase seismic activity. The treatment of PW for use in agriculture is an alternative to current disposal practices that can also provide supplemental water in regions where limited freshwater sources can affect agricultural production. This paper assesses the potential for developing PW as a water source for agriculture in the Anadarko basin, a major oil and gas field spanning parts of Kansas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and Texas. From 2011 to 2019, assessment of state oil and gas databases indicated that PW generation in the Anadarko Basin averaged 428 million m3/yr. A technoeconomic analysis of PW treatment was combined with geographical information on PW availability and composition to assess the costs and energy requirements to recover this PW as a non-conventional water resource for agriculture. The volume of freshwater economically extractable from PW was estimated to be between 58 million m3 per year using reverse osmosis (RO) treatment only and 82 million m3 per year using a combination of RO and mechanical vapor compression to treat higher salinity waters. These volumes could meet 1–2 % and 49–70 % of the irrigation and livestock water demands in the basin, respectively. PW recovery could also modestly contribute to mitigating the decline of the Ogallala aquifer by ~2 %. RO treatment costs and energy requirements, 0.3–1.5 $/m3 and 1.01–2.65 kWh/m3, respectively, are similar to those for deep well injection. Treatment of higher salinity waters increases costs and energy requirements substantially and is likely not economically feasible in most cases. The approach presented here provides a valuable framework for assessing PW as a supplemental water source in regions facing similar challenges.